Framework 59 · Affairs & Management

A proposed model — published to be tested, not believed

Spiralnomy

Neuroeconomics repurposed for flourishing — SpiritoScore-tuned incentives, Collabopetition, and Dynamical-sum replace zero-sum, winner-picking economics.

This framework is one piece of the whole; its full page is in preparation. The line above states its present scope.

Start the walk →

The proposed model

Spiralnomy

Current economic, financial, and monetary systems are zero-sum finite games that "pick winners" and serve a very small group. Spiralnomy repurposes neuroeconomics — reward systems, framing, risk assessment, social dynamics, resource allocation — to prioritize neural well-being over economic gain, with incentives continuously tuned against individuals' SpiritoScores; joy triggers replace stressors

Bridge — Biological collabopetition — the mechanisms interchaining the living world oblige people to collaborate while competing for the greater good; likewise the external incentive world acts as a dynamic "cast" molding our internal system, continuously rectifying our "genomic typos."

The proposed modelSpeculative
Sources & apparatus
Δ — contemporary science

Harré et al. on science as a zero-sum, winner-picking finite game; neuroeconomics (neuroscience + psychology + economics) on decision-making

The mystical reading

The reading beneath the claim.

(none in the body; Spiralnomy is the economic limb of the whole — its flourishing measure is the SpiritoScore; see fw-03.)

In practice

Something to do, not only accept.

Policy/design moves — replace GDP valuation; revise the legislation–monetary linkage (SEVEN BRANCH); adopt Collabopetition and the Dynamical-sum model; run blockchain "lottery-like operations" in lieu of zero-sum games; make Qreativity the new QPI; consume by the motto "less is more, more with less, and the best is not good enough." Addressing the Scalability Dilemma, this redefines human economic value through personalized, permission-based marketing — transforming the ad-driven "Battle for Our Attention" into individualized, face-to-face experiences

Where this sits

One piece of a larger instrument.

Builds on requires as groundwork

Groundwork this framework requires.

Informs feeds into

What this framework feeds into.

Runs parallel to analogous in form

The same shape of argument in another domain.

Shares a concept with overlapping ideas

Frameworks carrying an overlapping thread.