Framework 65 · Affairs & Management
A proposed model — published to be tested, not believed
Our Treety
Treaties define "peoples," form minorities-only cantons, grant self-determination to the unanimous; norms maintained by education, never enforcement.
This framework is one piece of the whole; its full page is in preparation. The line above states its present scope.
The proposed model
Our Treety
Existing treaties must be adjusted and new covenants created to define "peoples," form diverse 'minorities only' cantons, and grant autonomy to groups unanimous in their desire for internal and external self-determination — conventions to cope with global challenges as peremptory norms (jus cogens), upheld by an ongoing education platform ensuring maintenance and not enforcement of the norms
Bridge — none stated (applied international-law framework; the one-tree biological bridge of the governance cluster lives in its neighbors fw-60/fw-66)
The mystical reading
The reading beneath the claim.
(none in body; the tree-governance mystical layer belongs to neighbors fw-66 Treebalism and fw-60 Seven Branch — do not import it here)
In practice
Something to do, not only accept.
Policy/design move — adjust existing and draft new treaties and covenants; run consensus-driven processes to define "peoples"; charter minorities-only cantons; stand up the ongoing education platform that maintains (not enforces) the norms
Where this sits
One piece of a larger instrument.
Extends builds directly on
What this framework builds on.
Informs feeds into
What this framework feeds into.
Runs parallel to analogous in form
The same shape of argument in another domain.
Shares a concept with overlapping ideas
Frameworks carrying an overlapping thread.
Contrasts with pulls the other way
Frameworks that pull the other way.